Re(4): New Female Disperser Evidence Continued
IP: 50.241.112.193


We have learned that you cannot dismiss sightings either. And the estimate is also based on available habitat, and known density VS confirmations in other areas. Class 1 evidence is not easy. We have an unknown small population in New England and have enough trouble getting tracks or a picture, especially when the wildlife agencies push it away and call people nuts in some states. Between 2010 and 2015, the game escalated rapidly FYI. You might check around. Its a whole new ball game in those provinces. So you feel the 800 estimated population is wrong, and you know better than the gent that produced that estimate? Even though the Canadian wildlife people accept and believe it? Canada is only 165 miles from Massachusetts, and there have been confirmations there. I posted the evidence on dispersal and apparently you don't accept that either? Wow better be ready for a quick change! The public is no longer buying these fairy tales in our area where there are more and more credible sightings. Including a Phd wildlife biologist FYI.

Replies:
There have been no replies.



Post a reply:
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
bold italic underline left align right align center align url email image move quote horizontal rule

Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL:
Check this box if you want to be notified via email when someone replies to your post.

Create Your Own Free Message Board or Free Forum!
Hosted By Boards2Go Copyright © 2000-2018  Wedding thank you wording