Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk
Discussion forum for Jai-Alai Heaven
Foro de la discusión para el Cielo de Cesta Punta

Chalk Talk Registration    Participación en Chalk Talk
Useful Links    Hall of Fame    Miami scratches    Dania scratches
Question of the Week Archive (10+ years)

Re(4): New Hall of Famer for Craig G re: Game Point winners

does not seem like rocket science, and i have been a rocket scientist in my career

No disrespect intended, but it appears that the rocket scientist has overlooked the fact that there are elements of near symmetry involved.

You are looking at it from only the server side. What about the reverse?

server had to be at 5 or 6 points (spectacular 7 is assumption of course) receiving team could have 0,1,2,3,4,5,or 6 points

fine, but if R had won the point and game, we could reason...

receiver had to be at 5 or 6 points, serving post could have 2,3,4,5, or 6 points

the receiving team would only have had a chance to win if they had 5 or 6 points

true, but the flip side is...

the serving team would only have had a chance to win if they had 5 or 6 points

So we aren't making much headway with that line of thought. It isn't as simple as you depict it.

Which is why I was impressed that Bennett worked out 80% plus, presumably without doing any computer analysis.

tell me how this matters and how you use it to any advantage in betting?

Well, it's a curiosity, like retrograde analysis in chess.

But I think that to look at it as a scientist, once you have solid data, you then try to work out the theoretical implications.

As I said in another post, if nothing else, it illustrates how unlikely it is to receive your way to victory, especially in the worst posts. When we see a player winning from high posts in doubles, we strongly suspect that he is not struggling to win points when serving.

If in reality there is an ebb and flow to a player's ability to win doubles points on serve, it might work out that a 5-6-7-8 results index could reveal it to some extent.

If true, for someone like Tiger or anyone using a Skiena-based model, who use data mining techniques from the published results, that kind of correlation might be intriguing.


You must register before you can post on this board. You can register here.

Post a reply:
Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL:

Do you want to post on Chalk Talk?
In order to post your own messages on Chalk Talk, you must first register as a member.
USE THIS LINK >>> Chalk Talk Registration <<< USE THIS LINK to register.
Do NOT use the link above the posting box that says 'You must register ... register here'. It will not work.
Please report problems/questions directly to the Den E-mail: rsbassociates at mindspring dot com
Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk logos, format and graphics copyright © 2003-2018 by RSB Associates
Create Your Own Free Message Board or Free Forum!
Hosted By Boards2Go Copyright © 2000-2015
Our Sites: Wedding address collection  Wedding thank you wording