Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk
Discussion forum for Jai-Alai Heaven
Foro de la discusión para el Cielo de Cesta Punta

Chalk Talk Registration    Participación en Chalk Talk
Useful Links    Hall of Fame    Miami scratches    Dania scratches
Question of the Week Archive (10+ years)

Re(3): New Hall of Famer for Craig G re: Game Point winners

Hey patrickm

This is a somewhat tricky topic. The real issue is the scoring system.

Because the winner of a given point STAYS on the court, and is assigned the role of SERVER, it tricks you into thinking that the 88% is related somehow to serve advantage.

But if we changed the rules so that the winner of a point became the RECEIVER on the next point, then the receivers would get the 88%. Maybe even higher if there are more doubles games than singles.

So the 88% figure actually has nothing to do with serving, per se.

However, I would like to address your singles vs doubles question.

When you think about some of the greatest serve-stealers in the history of the game, do you you think that it would be correct to give their receive-winning-percentage to an early game front who doesn't ever go anywhere near the serve?

Or how about the top fronts in the late game championship singles? Just thinking about Dania, if Arriaga, Egi, Diego, Erik and others have their 'Serve and Take Control' game polished to perfection, should we go ahead and project that rate of winning on serve to the incomparably less skilled early game backs in game 1?

Not if we want to win.

Jose M Goitia, in his book, "Jai-Alai: The Other Side of the Screen", objected that "They don't see us as individuals". He didn't mean that in terms of S / R bias, but the complaint still applies.

So I think that the key is to ascertain the general bias in singles and doubles, think about WHY it exists, and then modify it on a per player basis.

But for a final thought, consider that even working out the general S / R bias is trickier than you think.

Let's imagine a singles player who is a whole level ahead of his competition in his all-court skills. But his serve is just ok. Every time he wins a point, he is assigned to serve where he wins again. And again. Nothing to do with the actual serve, but when you add up a bunch of point results from his games, you would say, "Wow, the servers are really kicking ass!". But the truth is that the better players are kicking it, and when they do, they get to serve more than the weaker guys, who typically receive once and then leave the court. Even the beloved partido system has this flaw. (but hurray for tennis, which doesn't)

So IMO, the truth is out there, but not on a silver platter.






Replies:
There have been no replies.



You must register before you can post on this board. You can register here.

Post a reply:
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Message:
Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL:

Do you want to post on Chalk Talk?
In order to post your own messages on Chalk Talk, you must first register as a member.
USE THIS LINK >>> Chalk Talk Registration <<< USE THIS LINK to register.
Do NOT use the link above the posting box that says 'You must register ... register here'. It will not work.
Please report problems/questions directly to the Den E-mail: rsbassociates at mindspring dot com
Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk logos, format and graphics copyright © 2003-2018 by RSB Associates
Create Your Own Free Message Board or Free Forum!
Hosted By Boards2Go Copyright © 2000-2015
Our Sites: Wedding address collection  Wedding thank you wording