New question for STU Posted on July 24, 2019 at 11:51:48 PM by MJAFANALWAYS
IMO while worth a try, moving the hottest early gamer up, worst performing of period late gamer down = bad idea.
I see a lot of Carballo demolition derbies of last week.
Why don't you guys think of a 2 game flip-flop, perhaps weakest late gamer plays the 2 singles in earlies just before doubles, the 2 singles right after doubles.
The early gamer who is hottest does the same. Each is displaced 2 games per night from their natural slot, while retaining 2 singles in the natural slot. I do realize guys in doubles may play 5 this way. Just for a week at a time, though.
That would avoid having a late gamer become hottest of week just burying early gamers, and avoid the inverse, as well.