Re(5): Site Cleanup Posted on August 10, 2021 at 03:28:03 AM by Fixling the "L" omission
Right Jim. There are some goodie two shoes Remember When sites who think any mention of the government past and present is political. Those people jsut wanna talk about restaurants they used to frequent or high school classmates.
As peeps are dying like flies over political decisions, as we did during Vietnam, how can you remove the gumment or politics from life?
There is a guy, "Exactly", who talks politics in here, someone just said 'he's back'.
Personally, I dont have any problem with him because unlike you, he doesnt do political attacks just because he can. Others in here choose to engage him whether in context of TV coverage or something else. When talking about political talk radio or TV news, political discussion IS talking shop. After all R/TV are part of the media so indeed politics does go with the territory in THIS room.
NOBODY engages you tho, Jim, but me. And I usually ignore you in my regular posts about the media until you interrupt and start your oh Byron personal attacks. (Well I quit reading them since they're all just cut and paste jobs.)
I dunno about others, but troublemakers can be interesting. Bullies can be both illegal stalkers and boring. I know you dont see the difference, being a bully yourself, but other readers might. I was obviously talking to them but since you so often disguise your authorship to me, I rarely think the attackers are anybody but you in drag again. Do you think critics of stations or formats or even personalities on them constitutes 'troublemaking"?
Obviously no one else would agree with you, given the trashing people do of their media employers.
I'd say generally, I don't write to you unless I'm either replying to your insults or mention you by name.
Being a media guy with a lot of mass appeal writing under my belt, I always write to readers in general, tho sometimes I use guys like you as an excuse to write a broader post. Like your several maladies. Replies: