Re(1): rhymes for dimes Posted on October 29, 2025 at 02:35:51 PM by Craig G
"Would of lost a lot of money and I ain't foolin'.
Wouldn't mind someone providing a clue as to how large a bet you can get away with on BC.
Then again, it might be that it's only if you are winning consistently, that the limits get imposed.
It seems to me that the law should require them to provide transparency at a bare minimum. It's not fair that they can make their policies and decisions in complete secrecy.
Eg, if you knew that $1000 per bet was the max before you get throttled, you could make an informed decision on whether or not to participate. Or $100, or whatever their self-serving algo comes up with.
This one-sided "Trust me bro" garbage doesn't cut it. Replies:
Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk
