Para nuestros invitados que hablan Español
Desafortunadamente, no tenemos dinero suficiente para que Chalk Talk sea bilingüe, pero si usted desea dejar mensajes en Español, hágalo sin ningún miedo. Deseamos que con esta información le hayamos facilitado el uso de nuestro foro.

Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk
Discussion forum for Jai-Alai Heaven
Foro de la discusión para el Cielo de Cesta Punta
Forum de discussion pour le Paradis de Pelote Basque

hits since 8/12/03

 OneStop Entries, Results, Statistics   Dania scratches
"Question of the Week" Archive   "Hall of Fame"

Registration not required, but please respect ...
Chalk Talk Terms of Service
Re(4): Ok then, a Chalkie Challenge.

Thanks for the response! Inspiring to see some thought put into this issue.

I think that using the input from a human expert who's paying full attention is defo going to be competitive (or better) with the output from computer algos.

However, FWIW, is we use the WPS results for both teams against the field to derive some figures, ie ~61% and ~43%, and then use the so-called Log5 formula, popularized by Bill James, for head-to-head match-ups, that works out to about 67.5% per point.

Personally, I would shade it closer to your figs, but regardless, as is, it's still safely beyond your cut point.

This seems like a classic bridge jumper case, actually better than most, where the would-be plunger is fortunate to have the opportunity. Wonder what the W&W bet limit might be.

Replies:


Post a reply:
Name:
Subject:
Message:
Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL:





Please report problems/questions directly to the Den - E-mail: rsbassociates at mindspring dot com
Tiger's Jai-Alai Chalk Talk logos, format and graphics copyright © 2003-2025 by RSB Associates
Create Your Own Free Message Board or Free Forum!
Hosted By Boards2Go Copyright © 2020


<-- -->