Re(1): Should be struck off!

Re(1): Should be struck off!
Posted on July 30, 2016 at 03:00:35 by Whoa

Calm down please. It was a relationship between two consenting adults - no offspring were harmed by it as they are both gay. Of course the GMC inquiry is because he was a former patient. No doubt a major error of judgement but not enough to ruin a career over - Moorfields non-withstanding. They simply slapped on the glamour to help in the case, then the newspaper accentuates it all.
What are you really annoyed about? That he is gay? That he is a brilliant surgeon and you are not?

Replies:

Re(1): Should be struck off! - By Curious July 29, 2016 at 22:18:07
- Re(2): Should be struck off! - By Disgusted July 29, 2016 at 22:27:06
  - Re(3): Should be struck off! - By Deviant July 29, 2016 at 22:35:11
    - Re(4): Should be struck off! - By Hate you July 30, 2016 at 01:37:02
      - Re(5): Should be struck off! - By Deviant July 31, 2016 at 22:41:03
        
        Re(6): Should be struck off! - By Magic fingers August 1, 2016 at 11:28:23
      - Re(5): Should be struck off! - By Lucky lucky guy July 30, 2016 at 18:49:12
        
        Re(6): Should be struck off! - By Anon August 21, 2016 at 16:10:31

Post a reply:

<-- -->

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:

Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL: