Rules:

DON'T POST ANY PORN, YOU WILL BE BANNED.

Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.

Any mention of an at least somewhat famous woman must be accompanied by a pic of her.

Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.

What is said in chat, stays in chat.

Don't be a jerk.

Admins - Beave, Yosterizer.
Admin Email - ( thevictorsboard at gmail dot com).
To Register - Email your desired handle and password to victardgoblue at gmail.com
Moderators - Ed, Rich, bh, DetroitBry, BBA
Ceremonial Moderator - wino
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Plug

The Victors

Chat || Scores Only || MGoBlog || Board #5 || UMHoops || Lods' Card Site || gbmcq@Rivals || Nikos chatroom

11W had a post that concluded "at the far end of this, there's a chance you're seeing Harbaugh in cuffs"
Posted on August 1, 2025 at 06:55:44 PM by daytripper

We're firmly into the revenge porn part of their delusion.

Replies:

These are real people too. A lot of them get it and are just ginning up dust, but there are others who actually believe the death penalty is coming, jbc and corum will be arrested, the season will be vacated, post season ban. These are the people who then hurt themselves/damage property when there is a fine and recruiting sanctions.* - By ameriKa August 2, 2025 at 04:41:44 AM
When this is over, I�m either going to be stunned and pissed at the announced punishments or dying laughing at all the schadenfreud.* - By apblue August 1, 2025 at 06:58:31 PM
- I'm either going to laugh or laugh. If they try to pull some vacating wins bullshit I'll laugh at the absurdity and not give AF because we were national champions fair and square. Or I'll laugh at our haters wasting so much time and energy. Either way, don't give a fuck* - By uncwolverine August 1, 2025 at 07:06:29 PM
  - I admit that I�ll be upset with any vacated wins or bans of any kind. Suspensions, show causes, recruiting restrictions, fines, whatevs. * - By plug August 1, 2025 at 08:40:24 PM
    - Theres zero precedent for any of those major punishments. Those are for programs trotting out ineligible players. We didnt have any of those, even considering Corum�s illegall LLC* - By ameriKa August 2, 2025 at 04:48:03 AM
- There is just nothing there for major violations or penalties. Also the NCAA never discussed bans or vacating during their discussions - By Rich August 1, 2025 at 07:02:55 PM
  - Unfortunately, failure to cooperate and failure to monitor are major violations in their eyes. Only thing worse is LOIC. Now, obviously what is not cooperating and what is not monitoring is their discretion and up to the COI. BUT neither of those lead to bans or vacating. Massive fines, recruiting restrictions, sure.* - By gbmcq August 1, 2025 at 09:01:32 PM
    - I think those are both refutable. Failure to cooperate? We retrieved deleted texts and let the NCAA conduct interviews in November during the season! All of that should have been pushed to December or January. Failure to monitor Stalions, ok, but I don't think there is a coach in the nation that can know what every guy is doing every day* - By Rich August 1, 2025 at 09:19:27 PM
      - Also I think Michigan could push back on the monitor charge... - By Rich August 1, 2025 at 09:22:12 PM
  - I appreciate your measured reasoning. But worst case scenario would be very UM-like. Clobbered for stupid shit that anyone else would get a slap on the wrist.* - By apblue August 1, 2025 at 07:12:27 PM
    - Exactly right ap* - By RK3 August 1, 2025 at 07:26:22 PM

You must register before you can post on this board. You can register here.

Post a reply:

<-- -->

Username:
Password:
Subject:
Message:

Link Name:
Link URL:
Image URL: