Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
Any mention of an at least somewhat famous woman must be accompanied by a pic of her.
Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
What is said in chat, stays in chat.
Don't be a jerk.
Admins - Beave, Yosterizer.
Admin Email - ( thevictorsboard at gmail dot com). To Register - Email your desired handle and password to victardgoblue at gmail.com Moderators - Ed, Rich, bh, DetroitBry, BBA Ceremonial Moderator - wino Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man
That's a good question - have starters seen their salaries drop (relative to other positions, relative to relievers) commensurate with the significant innings drop? Posted on August 1, 2025 at 08:49:07 PM by jjwalker
And with relievers, the extra innings they are pitching now relative to 40 years ago or whatever - I'm guessing it's more that they get split up among a deeper group of relievera rather than the top 2 or 3 getting more innings then they used to?
But is it the case that the 5th reliever who's pitching 70 inning versus the #2 starter throwing 170 makes much more, relative to each other, than when it was more like 20/220 back in the day?
(Numbers are just totally thrown out of my ass, of course. Please feel free to change/correct for accuracy). Replies: